G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Petitioner Jabir Dahir Abdulle, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and Magistrate Judge Deborah Fine's Report and Recommendation ("R&R) (Docs. 1, 10). The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss the Petition as being moot. Doc. 10 at 3. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 3 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 6(a), 6(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)).
The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will accept the R&R and dismiss the Petition as being moot. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.").
1. Magistrate Judge Fine's R&R (Doc. 10) is
2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is
3. The Clerk of Court shall
4. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate of appealability is required.