U.S. v. HOLDER, 4:15-CR-53-TUC-JAS. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20160128b13
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO , District Judge . Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Jesse William Holder's Motion to Suppress Statements (Doc. 17), United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 59), the Government's Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63), and Defendant's Response (Doc. 65). Because the Government objected to the conclusions of the Report, this Court reviews the Report de novo and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO , District Judge . Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Jesse William Holder's Motion to Suppress Statements (Doc. 17), United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 59), the Government's Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63), and Defendant's Response (Doc. 65). Because the Government objected to the conclusions of the Report, this Court reviews the Report de novo and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part,..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. SOTO, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is Defendant Jesse William Holder's Motion to Suppress Statements (Doc. 17), United States Magistrate Judge Macdonald's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 59), the Government's Objection to Report and Recommendation (Doc. 63), and Defendant's Response (Doc. 65). Because the Government objected to the conclusions of the Report, this Court reviews the Report de novo and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
After an independent de novo review, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. It is hereby ordered that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements (Doc. 17) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
