Cohn v. State, CV-15-00267-PHX-DLR. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20160321531
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER DOUGLAS L. RAYES , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett, (Doc. 52), regarding petitioner's "Notice of deteriorating medical condition and request for relief," (Doc. 34). The R&R recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's notice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 52 at 4 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).) Petitioner filed an objection
Summary: ORDER DOUGLAS L. RAYES , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett, (Doc. 52), regarding petitioner's "Notice of deteriorating medical condition and request for relief," (Doc. 34). The R&R recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's notice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 52 at 4 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).) Petitioner filed an objection ..
More
ORDER
DOUGLAS L. RAYES, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett, (Doc. 52), regarding petitioner's "Notice of deteriorating medical condition and request for relief," (Doc. 34). The R&R recommends that the Court deny Petitioner's notice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 52 at 4 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).) Petitioner filed an objection on February 25, 2016. (Doc. 54.)
The Court has considered the objection and has reviewed the R&R de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), and overrules Petitioner's objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate").
IT IS ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 54), is accepted. Petitioner's "Notice of deteriorating medical condition and request for relief," (Doc. 34), is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
