U.S. v. Dilley, 15-04206MJ-001-PCT-DMF. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20160502714
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH M. FINE , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing and the detention hearing were submitted on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised probation as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a fli
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH M. FINE , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing and the detention hearing were submitted on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised probation as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flig..
More
ORDER
DEBORAH M. FINE, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing and the detention hearing were submitted on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised probation as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised probation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as flight risk and danger, pending further revocation proceedings.
Source: Leagle
