ERIC J. MARKOVICH, Magistrate Judge.
On June 19, 2013 Kelly Lynn Kincer, an inmate confined (at that time) in the United States Penitentiary in Tucson, Arizona, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). Petitioner alleged that the Bureau of Prisons wrongfully deprived him of 7 days of Good Conduct Time. Respondent filed a Return and Answer (Doc. 14), and Petitioner did not file a Reply.
While Petitioner was incarcerated at USP—Tucson at the time of filing his Petition, the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator indicates that Petitioner was released from federal custody on February 11, 2016. Petitioner has not filed a notice of address change with the Court as required by LRCiv 83.3(d).
Because Petitioner has already been released from custody, the Petition is now moot and dismissal is appropriate. North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 (1971) ("federal courts are without power to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them"); Mitchell v. Dupnick, 75 F.3d 517, 528 (9th Cir. 1996); Fendler v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 846 F.2d 550, 555 (9th Cir. 1988) (finding that release of petitioner on parole mooted his petition seeking earlier release date on the grounds contending that Parole Commission had improperly delayed his release date).
Accordingly,