U.S. v. CARDENAS, 17-01370MJ-001. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20170602835
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 12, 2017
Latest Update: May 12, 2017
Summary: MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER OF DETENTION JAMES F. METCALF , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, Raul Ramirez Cardenas, having been charged in the District of Arizona with a violation of Counts One of Title 8 United States Code Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Magistrate Judge having determined from the affidavit of the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection filed in this case, the following persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) alleged in the complain
Summary: MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER OF DETENTION JAMES F. METCALF , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, Raul Ramirez Cardenas, having been charged in the District of Arizona with a violation of Counts One of Title 8 United States Code Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Magistrate Judge having determined from the affidavit of the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection filed in this case, the following persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) alleged in the complaint..
More
MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER OF DETENTION
JAMES F. METCALF, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant, Raul Ramirez Cardenas, having been charged in the District of Arizona with a violation of Counts One of Title 8 United States Code Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Magistrate Judge having determined from the affidavit of the Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection filed in this case, the following persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) alleged in the complaint:
Omar Gonzalez-Vasquez
Teofolio Ramirez-Diaz
The Magistrate Judge finds that it may become impracticable to secure the presence of the witness(es) by subpoena in further proceedings because they are not in the United States legally and have no legal residence or employment in this Country.
IT IS ORDERED that the witness(es) shall be detained pursuant to 18 USC sect; 3144 in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The witness(es) shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.
Source: Leagle
