Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Ayala, CR-15-00969-PHX-SPL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20180301j48 Visitors: 34
Filed: Feb. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER STEVEN P. LOGAN , District Judge . Movant Jesus Guadalupe Vasquez Ayala has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 ("Motion") (Doc. 1). On January 31, 2018, the Honorable James F. Metcalf, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the Court deny the Motion. Judge Metcalf advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and
More

ORDER

Movant Jesus Guadalupe Vasquez Ayala has filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ("Motion") (Doc. 1). On January 31, 2018, the Honorable James F. Metcalf, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the Court deny the Motion. Judge Metcalf advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. (Doc. 22 at 30); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).

The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will adopt the R&R and deny the Motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions."). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That Magistrate Judge Metcalf's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is accepted and adopted by the Court;

2. That the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (CV-17-00284-PHX-SPL, Doc. 1; Doc. 38, CR-15-00969-PHX-SPL) is denied;

3. That this case is dismissed with prejudice;

4. That a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied;

5. That the Clerk of Court shall file this Order in the underlying related criminal action, Case No. CR-15-00969-PHX-SPL; and

6. That the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer