Goedecke v. Ende, CV-17-1555-PHX-JAT (ESW). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20180314908
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG , Senior District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that Defendant Barnett be dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely serve Defendant Barnett. (Doc. 19). Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduc
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG , Senior District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that Defendant Barnett be dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely serve Defendant Barnett. (Doc. 19). Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. TEILBORG, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge recommending that Defendant Barnett be dismissed, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely serve Defendant Barnett. (Doc. 19).
Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection" (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted and adopted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Barnett is dismissed, without prejudice. Because other Defendants remain in this case, the Clerk of the Court shall not enter judgment at this time.
Source: Leagle
