Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Elanfassi v. Kelly, CV-18-00097-PHX-JAT. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20180523b09 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 22, 2018
Latest Update: May 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG , Senior District Judge . Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge recommending that this case be dismissed, without prejudice, as moot. (Doc. 10). No party has filed objections to the R&R. Because no party has filed objections, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not th
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge recommending that this case be dismissed, without prejudice, as moot. (Doc. 10). No party has filed objections to the R&R.

Because no party has filed objections, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection"; United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 10) is accepted;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition in this case is dismissed, without prejudice, as moot and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer