Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Gomez, CR09-01247-PHX-SRB. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20180620880 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN R. BOLTON , District Judge . Movant, Phillip Gomez, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 on June 29, 2017. The United States filed its response in opposition on October 31, 2017. Movant filed a reply on December 21, 2017. The Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on May 7, 2018 recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Jud
More

ORDER

Movant, Phillip Gomez, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on June 29, 2017. The United States filed its response in opposition on October 31, 2017. Movant filed a reply on December 21, 2017.

The Magistrate Judge filed her Report and Recommendation on May 7, 2018 recommending that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence be denied. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the Order of this Court. (Doc. 11)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because dismissal of the Motion is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the procedural ruling debatable.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer