Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bracamontes-Reyes v. Sessions, CV-18-01301-PHX-DLR. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20180801843 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER DOUGLAS L. RAYES , District Judge . Before the Court are Petitioner Ruben Bracamontes-Reyes' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 2), and Motion to Expedite Ruling on Motion Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. 15), along with United States Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 21). The R&R recommends that the Court deny and dismiss with prejudice the petition and deny as moot th
More

ORDER

Before the Court are Petitioner Ruben Bracamontes-Reyes' Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 2), and Motion to Expedite Ruling on Motion Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. 15), along with United States Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 21). The R&R recommends that the Court deny and dismiss with prejudice the petition and deny as moot the remaining motions. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. See United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Neither party filed objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) ("[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection."); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's disposition that has been properly objected to."). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well-taken. The Court will accept the R&R in its entirety. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate"); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) ("The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.").

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Boyle's R&R (Doc. 21) is ACCEPTED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order and Motion to Expedite Ruling on Petition for Habeas Corpus (Docs. 2, 15) are DENIED as moot. The Clerk shall terminate this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer