Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce. (Doc. 2520) In compliance with the Court's previous Orders interpreting substantial non-compliance, the Court finds as follows. (Doc. 2644) The following PM/locations are not substantially non-compliant: • PM 19 at Perryville • PM 19 at Phoenix • PM 19 at Tucson • PM 67 at Florence • PM 67 at Perryville • PM 73 at Tucson The following PM/locations meet the Stipulation's defini
Summary: ORDER ROSLYN O. SILVER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce. (Doc. 2520) In compliance with the Court's previous Orders interpreting substantial non-compliance, the Court finds as follows. (Doc. 2644) The following PM/locations are not substantially non-compliant: • PM 19 at Perryville • PM 19 at Phoenix • PM 19 at Tucson • PM 67 at Florence • PM 67 at Perryville • PM 73 at Tucson The following PM/locations meet the Stipulation's definit..
More
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce. (Doc. 2520) In compliance with the Court's previous Orders interpreting substantial non-compliance, the Court finds as follows. (Doc. 2644)
The following PM/locations are not substantially non-compliant:
• PM 19 at Perryville
• PM 19 at Phoenix
• PM 19 at Tucson
• PM 67 at Florence
• PM 67 at Perryville
• PM 73 at Tucson
The following PM/locations meet the Stipulation's definition of non-compliant but are recently compliant and so the Court will not order a remediation plan:
• PM 44 at Winslow
• PM 48 at Tucson
• PM 95 at Tucson
• PM 96 at Tucson
• PM 98 at Tucson
The following PM/locations are non-compliant and the Court will require Defendants to provide a remediation plan:
• PM 19 at Eyman
• PM 19 at Lewis
• PM 52 at Phoenix
• PM 67 at Tucson
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce (Doc. 2520).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PM 48 at Tucson, PM 95 at Tucson, and PM 96 at Tucson are substantially non-compliant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that PM 19 at Eyman, PM 19 at Lewis, PM 52 at Phoenix, and PM 67 at Tucson are substantially non-compliant. Defendants shall file a remedial plan tailored to each of these PM/locations no later than October 22, 2018.
