U.S. v. Wilson, CR-18-08298-001-PCT-GMS. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20181130843
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER EILEEN S. WILLETT , Magistrate Judge . The Court has considered Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Doc. 11) and the Government's Response (Doc. 12). The Court finds that the Defendant has failed to provide new information that was not known at the time of his detention hearing as required by 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2)(B), nor does the information presented have a material bearing on whether conditions of release exist that will reasonably ensure the appearance of Defenda
Summary: ORDER EILEEN S. WILLETT , Magistrate Judge . The Court has considered Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Doc. 11) and the Government's Response (Doc. 12). The Court finds that the Defendant has failed to provide new information that was not known at the time of his detention hearing as required by 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2)(B), nor does the information presented have a material bearing on whether conditions of release exist that will reasonably ensure the appearance of Defendan..
More
ORDER
EILEEN S. WILLETT, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has considered Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Doc. 11) and the Government's Response (Doc. 12).
The Court finds that the Defendant has failed to provide new information that was not known at the time of his detention hearing as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(B), nor does the information presented have a material bearing on whether conditions of release exist that will reasonably ensure the appearance of Defendant at future hearings and the safety of any other person or the community. Therefore, Defendant has failed to meet his burden of proof to reopen his detention hearing.
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant's Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Doc. 11).
Source: Leagle
