Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nikola Corporation v. Tesla Incorporated, CV 18-1344-PHX-JAS (BPV). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20181217762 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO , District Judge . Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Velasco. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Velasco recommends granting Defendant's motion to transfer venue. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motion, Plaintiff's objections are denied. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) is ac
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Velasco. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Velasco recommends granting Defendant's motion to transfer venue. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motion, Plaintiff's objections are denied.1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Velasco's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) is accepted and adopted. However, the Court declines to rule on the pending motion to dismiss (Doc. 26); the motion to dismiss shall remain pending upon the transfer of venue. (2) Defendant's motion to transfer venue (Doc. 44) is granted; the Clerk of the Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

FootNotes


1. The Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Even if a de novo standard applied, the Court would still adopt the Report and Recommendation.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer