ORDER

DAVID C. BURY, District Judge.

On October 25, 2018, this Court ordered the United States Marshall to serve the Summons and First Amended Complaint (Doc. 16) on the Bureau of Prisons (BOP), pursuant to the directives set out in the Court's Order (Doc. 80) issued on May 30, 2018.1 Those directives included the following: "The United States Marshal must send by certified mail a copy of the Summons for Defendant Bureau of Prisons [(BOP)], a Summons for the United States, the Second Amended Complaint, and this Order to (1) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona; (2) the Attorney General of the United States; and (3) the Bureau of Prisons pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(i)(1) & (2)." (Order (Doc. 80) at 8.)

To be clearer, service must be performed precisely pursuant to these directives—no other means of tendering the Summons and First Amended Complaint will do. The certified mail2 must be addressed as follows: (1) the civil process clerk at the office of the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, Tucson Division at: 405 West Congress St., Suite 4800, Tucson, AZ 85701;3 (2) the Attorney General of the United States at: The Department of Justice, 10th and Constitution Ave, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20053; and (3) the Bureau of Prisons at: 320 First St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20534. A review of the docket reflects that the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has been served.4 (Doc. 94.) The United States Marshal shall immediately comply with this Court's prior Order and complete the service on the BOP by certified mail.

Additionally, the Court addresses the Plaintiff's Motion for Subpoenas. (Doc. 95.) The Plaintiff seeks discovery broader than the scope of this case, which is limited to allegations against individual BOP officers that they showed inmates Pinson's law enforcement files from the Department of Justice (DOJ) identifying her cooperation, i.e., labeling her a snitch, thereby, causing her to be assaulted. She brings an Eighth Amendment claim under Bivens5 against the officers and alleges a Privacy Act claim against the BOP. There is no relevancy to the discovery sought pursuant to the requested subpoena.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Subpoena (Doc. 95) requested for issuance to the House Government Oversight and Reform Committee for materials related to misconduct by high-ranking BOP officials and coverup by DOJ officials is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall complete service by certified mail of the Summons, the First Amended Complaint, and a copy of this Order, immediately.