Chaney v. Phoenix Union High School District Governing Board, CV-19-00888-PHX-DWL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20190607c36
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER DOMINIC W. LANZA , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' "Stipulation and Agreement for Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint" (Doc. 20). The stipulation will be denied as moot. Plaintiff need not seek leave of the Court before filing an amendment with the opposing party's written consent. LRCiv 15.1(b). Plaintiff is directed to follow the procedure outlined in LRCiv 15.1(b), which requires Plaintiff to file his amended complaint, and then separately file a not
Summary: ORDER DOMINIC W. LANZA , District Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' "Stipulation and Agreement for Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint" (Doc. 20). The stipulation will be denied as moot. Plaintiff need not seek leave of the Court before filing an amendment with the opposing party's written consent. LRCiv 15.1(b). Plaintiff is directed to follow the procedure outlined in LRCiv 15.1(b), which requires Plaintiff to file his amended complaint, and then separately file a noti..
More
ORDER
DOMINIC W. LANZA, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' "Stipulation and Agreement for Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint" (Doc. 20). The stipulation will be denied as moot. Plaintiff need not seek leave of the Court before filing an amendment with the opposing party's written consent. LRCiv 15.1(b). Plaintiff is directed to follow the procedure outlined in LRCiv 15.1(b), which requires Plaintiff to file his amended complaint, and then separately file a notice of filing, attaching a redlined copy of the amended complaint and certifying that the opposing party gave written consent for the amendment.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the parties' "Stipulation and Agreement for Plaintiff to File First Amended Complaint" (Doc. 20) is denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
