Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Peek, CV-18-00009-PHX-SPL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20190802743 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER STEVEN P. LOGAN , District Judge . In July 2015, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada entered a stipulated judgment against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff for $1,084,667.42 (Doc. 1 at 2-3). Plaintiff registered the judgment in this Court in February 2018 (Doc. 4). A writ was issued for the garnishment of Judgment-Debtor Michael Peek's non-exempt earnings at Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. ("Garnishee") (Doc. 6). Garnishee filed an Answer (Doc. 9), and t
More

ORDER

In July 2015, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada entered a stipulated judgment against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff for $1,084,667.42 (Doc. 1 at 2-3). Plaintiff registered the judgment in this Court in February 2018 (Doc. 4). A writ was issued for the garnishment of Judgment-Debtor Michael Peek's non-exempt earnings at Morris-Shea Bridge Company, Inc. ("Garnishee") (Doc. 6). Garnishee filed an Answer (Doc. 9), and the Defendants/Judgement-Debtors, Michael Peek and Brenda Peek, filed a Motion to Quash (Doc. 10).

The Honorable Eileen S. Willett, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Doc. 20), recommending that the Court deny the Judgment-Debtors' Motion (Doc. 10). The Judgment-Debtors filed an Objection (Doc. 21), and the Plaintiff/Judgement-Creditor filed a Response to the Objection (Doc. 22).

The Court has undertaken an extensive review of the issues presented in the Objection (Doc. 21) and Response to the Objection (Doc. 22). Upon that review, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Willett's recommendations are wholly supported. The Court thus adopts Judge Willett's R&R and the underlying reasoning. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is accepted and adopted by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Objection to the R&R (Doc. 21) is overruled.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Quash (Doc. 10) is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer