Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MD Helicopters Incorporated v. United States, CV-19-02236-PHX-JAT. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20190806862 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. TEILBORG , Senior District Judge . Pending before the Court are the Federal Defendants' Motion to File Expert Report of Dr. Timothy Sestak Under Seal (Doc. 120) and Plaintiff MD Helicopters Incorporated's ("MDHI") Motion to File Plaintiff's Position Brief Re Expert Disclosure Deadlines Under Seal (Doc. 117). The Federal Defendants' Motion to seal Dr. Sestak's expert report avers that this report not only includes express quotations and references to sealed portions of the ad
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court are the Federal Defendants' Motion to File Expert Report of Dr. Timothy Sestak Under Seal (Doc. 120) and Plaintiff MD Helicopters Incorporated's ("MDHI") Motion to File Plaintiff's Position Brief Re Expert Disclosure Deadlines Under Seal (Doc. 117).

The Federal Defendants' Motion to seal Dr. Sestak's expert report avers that this report not only includes express quotations and references to sealed portions of the administrative record, but contains information protected from disclosure under the Protective Order entered in this case and under federal statutes, specifically 10 U.S.C. § 2371b(h) and 10 U.S.C. § 130. (Doc. 120 at 2-3). The Federal Defendants' further state that the information contained in Dr. Sestak's report may also be subject to claims of trade secret protection by MDHI. (Id. at 3). The Court will grant the Federal Defendants' Motion (Doc. 120) for the reasons stated in the Court's June 7, 2019 Order (Doc. 81).

MDHI's Motion to seal its position statement regarding expert disclosures states that this position brief contains factual material and related opinion that consists of trade secret information because it reveals the substance of its proposal submitted to the Army under the FARA CP solicitation. (Doc. 117 at 2). Particularly, MDHI's position brief discusses Dr. Sestak's expert report, which includes material concerning MDHI's proposal as well as the Army's evaluation of MDHI's proposal. (Id.). MDHI also avers that the material in its position brief constitutes source selection information that is protected from disclosure pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 2371b(h), which incorporates the Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C. § 2102. (Id.). The Court will grant MDHI's Motion (Doc. 117) for the reasons stated in the Court's June 7, 2019 Order (Doc. 81).

Finding "compelling reasons" to do so, Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006),

IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Defendants' Motion to File Expert Report of Dr. Timothy Sestak Under Seal (Doc. 120) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal the document presently lodged at Doc. 121.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that MDHI's Motion to File Plaintiff's Position Brief Re Expert Disclosure Deadlines Under Seal (Doc. 117) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal the document presently lodged at Doc. 118.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer