United States v. Enriquez-Venzor, CR-18-02299-TUC-RCC (EJM). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20190930896
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER RANER C. COLLINS , Senior District Judge . The Court having made a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation prepared by Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich (Doc. 51), the objection filed thereto, the response to the objection and the reply to the response. The Court finds the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is well reasoned. The evidence clearly suggests the defendant was read all applicable information and understood it as it was given in his native language. The
Summary: ORDER RANER C. COLLINS , Senior District Judge . The Court having made a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation prepared by Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich (Doc. 51), the objection filed thereto, the response to the objection and the reply to the response. The Court finds the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is well reasoned. The evidence clearly suggests the defendant was read all applicable information and understood it as it was given in his native language. The f..
More
ORDER
RANER C. COLLINS, Senior District Judge.
The Court having made a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation prepared by Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich (Doc. 51), the objection filed thereto, the response to the objection and the reply to the response.
The Court finds the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is well reasoned. The evidence clearly suggests the defendant was read all applicable information and understood it as it was given in his native language. The failure to have him sign the back of the form that was read to him does not constitute a due process violation. His initials on four pages of the other document indicates also indicates there was no due process violation. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22.) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
