SPECIAL MASTER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES

WILLIS D. HAWLEY, Special Master.

Overview

On September 20, 2019, the Mendoza plaintiffs filed objections to the District's completion plan for extracurricular activities asserting that the District had not provided information required by the Court in its September 6, 2018 order. On October 10, 2019, the District responded to the Mendoza plaintiffs' objections. While the District provided substantial information requested by the Court, the way the information was provided raises questions that need answering if the Court's intentions are to be adequately addressed.

The Court directed the District to identify any extracurricular activities that were not providing students the opportunity to participate in positive ways with students of other races. The Mendoza plaintiffs drew attention to this mandate and the District responded by indicating there were four single race nonathletic extracurricular activities in 2016-17, two in 17-18 and eight in 2018-19.1 Many of these schools were racially concentrated. But as the District reports this information, it seems that the activities in 2016-17 cease to exist in subsequent years, and the eight activities listed in the 2018-19 school year were initiated that year. Given the nature of the activities — such as the Boy Scouts. If it is true, there is substantial instability in the extracurricular activities TUSD.

The information provided by the District on extracurricular activities is quite difficult to analyze in the form in which it is presented. There are five pages of listings of the schools with no headings on the last four pages and the schools are listed randomly. The types and number of activities vary significantly from school to school (something not noted) depending, it seems, on whether teachers (some paid but others volunteer) are willing to sponsor and oversee particular activities. This suggests that nonathletic extracurricular activities are very limited at many schools.

On page two of its response to the Mendoza plaintiffs, the District says, "High numbers of students participate in athletics, fine arts and clubs at all schools." This is clearly not the case. For example, Sabino and Tucson High have numerous nonathletic extracurricular activities but Catalina has only three, Rincon has only one, and Santa Rita has none.

There are good reasons to compare the availability of extracurricular activities at different schools. Research suggests a correlation between participation and student achievement, especially in non-athletic activities. The Court also asked the District to provide information about how activities are funded. As noted, many are supported by teachers and some teachers receive stipends, others apparently do not. There is a high school activities fund but only five activities at four schools appear to receive funding from this source.

Recommendation

So that the questions posed by the court can be reliably answered, the District should provide the information below listing schools by the four grade structures in the District and alphabetically. While the information should be as accurate as possible, the District should indicate which estimates are most problematic.

The Special Master suggests the following formatting of needed information: