More v. Arizona Department of Corrections, CV19-4530 PHX DGC. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20200113781
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file and serve his lodged proposed Third Amended Complaint. Doc. 21. United States Magistrate Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion be denied. Doc. 27. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 149 (1985); Uni
Summary: ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file and serve his lodged proposed Third Amended Complaint. Doc. 21. United States Magistrate Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion be denied. Doc. 27. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 149 (1985); Unit..
More
ORDER
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file and serve his lodged proposed Third Amended Complaint. Doc. 21. United States Magistrate Camille D. Bibles has issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion be denied. Doc. 27. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the motion.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The R&R (Doc.27) is accepted.
2. The motion to file and serve the proposed Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 21) is denied.
3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied.
Source: Leagle
