Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Allen, CR-11-00989-002-PHX-DJH. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Arizona Number: infdco20200304819 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER DIANE J. HUMETEWA , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on non-party Michelle Allen's pro per Motions to Quash (Docs. 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 & 168) and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued by United States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine (Doc. 183). Therein, Magistrate Judge recommends that non-party Michelle Allen's Motions to Quash be denied. ( Id. ) Judge Fine advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections. (Doc. 183 at 11). The pa
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on non-party Michelle Allen's pro per Motions to Quash (Docs. 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 & 168) and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued by United States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine (Doc. 183). Therein, Magistrate Judge recommends that non-party Michelle Allen's Motions to Quash be denied. (Id.)

Judge Fine advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections. (Doc. 183 at 11). The parties have not filed objections and the time to do so has expired. Absent any objections, the Court is not required to review the findings and recommendations in the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1989) (the relevant provision of the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), "does not on its face require any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection").

Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the R&R and agrees with its findings and recommendations. The Court will, therefore, accept the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) ("A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge."); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) (same).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Fine R&R (Doc. 183) is accepted and adopted as the order of this Court. As stated in the R&R, the subpoenas to which the Motions to Quash (Docs. 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167 & 168) pertain are in full force in effect with a return date of thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer