Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE LINEBACK, 515 B.R. 532 (2014)

Court: Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit Number: inbco20140829g80 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2014
Summary: OPINION DANIEL S. OPPERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. The issue on appeal before the Panel is whether the bankruptcy court erred in avoiding the transfer of real property to Carolyn Blackwell pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 548 and ordering recovery of transferred property from Carolyn Blackwell pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 550 and in denying Carolyn Blackwell a claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 550(e). After reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy cour
More

OPINION

DANIEL S. OPPERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

The issue on appeal before the Panel is whether the bankruptcy court erred in avoiding the transfer of real property to Carolyn Blackwell pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 548 and ordering recovery of transferred property from Carolyn Blackwell pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550 and in denying Carolyn Blackwell a claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550(e). After reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and applicable law, the Panel concludes that the bankruptcy court did not err. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court's thorough and well-reasoned opinions entered on December 17, 2013, Tabor v. Lineback, (In re Lineback), Ch. 7 Case No. 12-11369, Adv. No. 12-5154 (Bankr. W.D.Tenn.2013) ECF No. 48, and February 6, 2014, Tabor v. Lineback, (In re Lineback), Ch. 7 Case No. 12-11369, Adv. No. 12-5154 (Bankr.W.D.Tenn. 2013) ECF No. 59, we affirm.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer