Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

09-32 274, 09-32 274 (2014)

Court: Board of Veterans' Appeals Number: 09-32 274 Visitors: 31
Filed: Aug. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: On July 21, 2014, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant, through his authorized representative, that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested. 38 U.S.C.A. 38 C.F.R.Department of Veterans Affairs
Citation Nr: 1438752	
Decision Date: 08/29/14    Archive Date: 09/03/14

DOCKET NO.  09-32 274	)	DATE
	)


On appeal from the decision of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Detroit, Michigan


THE ISSUE

Entitlement to an effective date prior to April 10, 2006, for the grant of service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).  


REPRESENTATION

Appellant represented by:	The American Legion


ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD

T. Sherrard, Counsel


INTRODUCTION

The Veteran, who is the Appellant in this case, had active service from September 1967 to September 1971.  

This matter comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (BVA or Board) from a February 2009 rating decision by the above Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO).


FINDING OF FACT

On July 21, 2014, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant, through his authorized representative, that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested.


CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the appellant have been met.  38 U.S.C.A. § 7105(b)(2), (d)(5) (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2013).


REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C.A. § 7105 (West 2002).  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (2013).  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative.  38 C.F.R. § 20.204.  In the present case, the appellant, through his authorized representative, has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration.  Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal, and it is dismissed.


ORDER

The appeal is dismissed.




		
JONATHAN B. KRAMER
	Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals




Department of Veterans Affairs


Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer