Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company, 5989 (1962)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 5989 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 15, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: , Lawrence B. Biebel, Dayton, Ohio, with whom Dailey L. Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, Robert L. Meade, Boston, Mass., Marechal, Biebel, French Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, and Hale Dorr, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for appellee., Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges., PER CURIAM.

303 F.2d 830

133 U.S.P.Q. 667

Michael H. JULIANO, Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
HOBART MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 5989.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Heard June 7, 1962.
Decided June 15, 1962.

Harold E. Cole, Boston, mass., for appellant.

Lawrence B. Biebel, Dayton, Ohio, with whom Dailey L. Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, Robert L. Meade, Boston, Mass., Marechal, Biebel, French & Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, and Hale & Dorr, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for appellee.

Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The plaintiff, having made and sold to the public an attachment for defendant's machine, sold one to defendant, to which he now seeks to attach a confidential relationship. After the sale to defendant the plaintiff obtained a design patent on his device. Defendant presently manufactures an attachment which admittedly is so different that there is no infringement of plaintiff's design patent. The district court ordered summary judgment for the defendant. There was no error.

2

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer