Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

89-3361 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 89-3361 Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 24, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: , United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge., PER CURIAM:, 1, David P. Stratton, trustee in bankruptcy for First American Mortgage Co. (FAMCO), appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Equitable Bank, N.A.

912 F.2d 464
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David B. STRATTON, Trustee for the estates of First American
Mortgage Company, Inc., A Maryland Corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
First American Mortgage Company, Inc., an Alabama
Corporation, First Financial Mortgage Company of Arizona,
Inc., First Coast Mortgage Company of California, Inc.,
First American Mortgage Company, Inc., Nationwide Mortgage
Company, Inc., First Shore Mortgage Company, First American
South Corporation, a Georgia Corporation, First American
South Corporation (GEORGIA), First American Mortgage Company
of Idaho, Inc., First Midwest Mortgage Company, First
American Mortgage Company of Louisiana, Inc., MH Mortgage
Company, Inc., First American Mortgage Company of Minnesota,
Inc., First American Mortgage Company of Nevada, Inc., First
American Mortgage Company of New Hampshire, Inc., First New
Mexico Mortgage Company, Inc., First American Mortgage
Company of Ohio, Inc., First American Mortgage Company of
Oregon, Inc., First American Mortgage Company, Inc., A South
Carolina Corporation, First American Mortgage Company of
South Dakota, Inc., First American South Corporation, a
Virginia Corporation, FAM Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Plaintiffs,
v.
EQUITABLE BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-3361.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 4, 1990.
Decided Aug. 24, 1990.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Sept. 24, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-88-1485-H)

John Edward James, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Delaware, (argued), for appellant; William J. Marsden, Jr., William R. Denny, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, Delaware, David Freishtat, Paul Mark Sandler, Raymond D. Burke, Freishtat & Sandler, Baltimore, Md., on brief.

Michael Davis Colglazier, Hogan & Hartson, Baltimore, Md., (argued), for appellee; John H. Culver, III, Hogan & Hartson, Baltimore, Md., on brief.

D.Md.

104 B.R. 713

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

David P. Stratton, trustee in bankruptcy for First American Mortgage Co. (FAMCO), appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Equitable Bank, N.A. (Equitable). Specifically, Stratton asserts error in the district court's summary dismissal of the following claims: (1) that Equitable's deposit of unendorsed checks made payable to FAMCO constituted conversion under Maryland Law, Md.Com.Law Code Ann. Sec. 3-419(1)(c); (2) that certain payments on mortgages held by Equitable constituted fraudulent conveyances under Secs. 544(b), 548, and 550(a) of the bankruptcy code, 11 U.S.C. Secs. 544(b), 548, and 550(a), and Md.Com.Law Code Ann. Sec. 15-201; (3) that certain collateral held by Equitable should have been equitably subordinated to the claims of other creditors, or alternatively that such collateral should be recharacterized as an unsecured capital contribution; (4) that Stratton should have been permitted to treat certain payments made by FAMCO to Equitable as voidable preferences under Secs. 547(b) and 550 of the bankruptcy code, 11 U.S.C. Secs. 547(b) and 550(a); (5) that Equitable's setoff-counterclaim should have been dismissed for failure to file a proof-of-claim in bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the briefs of counsel, heard oral argument, and satisfied ourselves concerning the facts of the case and the applicable law. The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Equitable, explaining its reasons in a comprehensive memorandum opinion. See Stratton v. Equitable Bank, N.A., 104 B.R. 713 (D.Md.1988). We affirm on the basis of that opinion.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer