Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

92-4168 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 92-4168 Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 22, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1066, NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.Donald DOYLE; William Peterson;

983 F.2d 1066

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Donald DOYLE; William Peterson; Bernard Shock,
Representatives of the Class of Unit Owners at Anchor Pointe
Boat-A-Minium, excepting therefrom the units owned by the
Successor Developer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Dan SUTPHIN, et al., Defendants,
Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for First Federal
Savings and Loan Association of Toledo; Resolution Trust
Corporation, Conservator of First Federal Savings
Association of Toledo, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-4168.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1992.

Before RALPH B. GUY, Jr. and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

Plaintiffs appeal the order of the district court granting the motion of the Resolution Trust Corporation for summary judgment. The order does not, however, resolve the claims against defendants William Baker and Town and Country. The Resolution Trust Corporation now moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

2

Absent certification for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., an order disposing of fewer than all parties or claims in an action is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 102 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam). The order that plaintiffs appeal does not resolve all of the claims in the action and has not been certified by the district court for interlocutory review.

3

It therefore is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer