Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Torres-Gonzalez v. Benito, 93-1454 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 93-1454 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 09, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary:  Ramon Torres Gonzalez (Torres) was ___________ arrested by federal agents and local police at his home in Puerto Rico on the night of September 18, 1987. Torres' children claim to have been scared during the arrest but, with nothing more alleged, this is hardly actionable conduct.
USCA1 Opinion









February 7, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]




UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 93-1454

RAMON TORRES GONZALEZ, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

SARGENTO BENITO, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.
.
____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________

Torruella and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Frederic Chardon Dubos for appellants.
______________________
Silvia Carreno Coll, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom
___________________
Charles E. Fitzwilliam, United States Attorney, was on brief for
_______________________
appellees Thomas M. Telles and Cruz Cordero, Jr.
Vannessa Ramirez, Assistant Solicitor General, Department of
_________________
Justice, with whom Carlos Lugo Fiol, Acting Solicitor General, and
_________________
Reina Colon De Rodriguez, Acting Deputy Solicitor General, were on
_________________________
brief for state defendants-appellees Benito and Lopez-Feliciano.


____________________


____________________
















Per Curiam. Ramon Torres Gonzalez ("Torres") was
___________

arrested by federal agents and local police at his home in

Puerto Rico on the night of September 18, 1987. He was

charged with possessing cocaine with intent to distribute.

21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). He was subsequently tried and

acquitted by the jury. On September 19, 1988, Torres, his

wife, and two children brought a civil action charging

various federal and local law enforcement officers with

violating the plaintiffs' constitutional rights, primarily

based upon alleged rough treatment meted out to Torres

incident to his arrest.

The named defendants were two agents of the Drug

Enforcement Administration, a Puerto Rico police sergeant, a

local police detective, and the superintendent of police in

Puerto Rico (who was charged with inadequately supervising

the police). The constitutional claims against the local

officials were based on 42 U.S.C. 1983, 1985; those

against the federal officials were apparently based on Bivens
______

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of
_________________________________________________________

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Related pendent claims were
_________

asserted under Puerto Rican law.

After a number of motions and deposition discovery, the

defendants moved for summary judgment. The magistrate judge

recommended that the defendants' motions for summary judgment

be granted and that the pendant state claims not be



-2-
-2-















entertained. The district court adopted the recommendation,

granting summary judgment on the merits on the federal claims

and declining to proceed with the state claims. The

plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

In their brief on appeal, the only claim that plaintiffs

try seriously to develop is Torres' own claim that the agents

used excessive force incident to the arrest.1 Although he

says that the agents used vile language, we do not think this

makes out a constitutional claim, nor can much weight be

given to Torres' terse statement that he was grabbed by the

chest and pushed onto a sofa. He does not claim to have been

struck. The only allegation that arouses some concern is his

claim that his hands were handcuffed behind him during his

transportation in such a way that his hands swelled and were

sore for several days.

Although Torres' brief on appeal cites only to his right

to "substantive" due process, the Supreme Court has said that

abuse incident to arrest is tested under the Fourth

Amendment's more specific provisions governing seizure.

Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989); cf. Albright v.
______ ______ ___ ________

Oliver, 62 U.S.L.W. 4078 (U.S. Jan. 24, 1994) (plurality
______



____________________

1The amended complaint charged that the arrest was made
without a warrant but in due course a warrant was produced
and is not challenged on appeal. The complaint also alleged
that Torres' car and apartment were searched but the brief on
appeal makes no effort to show that the searches were
unlawful.

-3-
-3-















opinion). Whatever the constitutional source of protection,

trying to determine when physical force is so excessive as to

amount to unconstitutional official action is a recurrent and

vexing problem that arises in various situations. E.g.,
____

Hudson v. McMillian, 112 S. Ct. 995 (1992) (prison
______ _________

discipline).

Accepting all of Torres' allegations as true--for

purposes of summary judgment--we agree with the magistrate

judge and the district court that tight handcuffs standing

alone are not enough to proceed to trial on a constitutional

claim. "[M]inor physical injuries simply are insufficient to

support an inference that . . . officers used inordinate

force to effect the intended arrest . . . ." Dean v. City of
____ _______

Worcester, 924 F.2d 364, 369 (1st Cir. 1991). Torres himself
_________

said in deposition that he had never asked a doctor to treat

the injury and never visited a hospital, nor is there any

claim of permanent damage. Compare Hansen v. Black, 885 F.2d
_______ ______ _____

642 (9th Cir. 1989).

The Supreme Court has cautioned against using subjective

tests or looking to motivation in appraising excessive force

claims under the Fourth Amendment. Graham, 490 U.S. at 397-
______

99. Yet Torres' claim fares no better even if one thinks

that why an action was taken might cast some indirect light

on the objective reasonableness of the action. Here, there

is no evidence that the police deliberately aimed to mistreat



-4-
-4-















Torres, to retaliate against him, or to do anything unrelated

to ordinary security measures in aid of an arrest. Compare
_______

Hansen, 885 F.2d at 645.
______

This conclusion disposes of the case as it has been

briefed on appeal. Torres' children claim to have been

scared during the arrest but, with nothing more alleged, this

is hardly actionable conduct. Torres' wife was apparently

searched at another location but nothing in the appeals brief

even hints at the supposed wrong. Finally, the brief refers

in passing to testimony given by one of the agents at trial

but the brief does not explain what was unlawful, and we

treat the issue as abandoned.

Affirmed.
________



























-5-
-5-







Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer