Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gutierrez-Diaz v. United States, 93-2090 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 93-2090 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 10, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: USCA1 Opinion ____________________ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Hector M. Laffitte, U.S. District Judge] ___________________ ____________________ Before Torruella, Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges. 1984) _______ _____________ (per curiam).
USCA1 Opinion












June 10, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 93-2090

BENITO GUTIERREZ-DIAZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant, Appellee.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO


[Hon. Hector M. Laffitte, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Benito Gutierrez-Diaz on brief pro se.
_____________________
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, and Fidel A. Sevillano Del
_____________ _______________________
Rio, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
___


____________________


____________________



















Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the record
__________

and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the

district court for essentially the reasons stated in its

careful and well-reasoned Opinion and Order, dated August 11,

1993. We only add that, upon the facts alleged by appellant,

the court did not err in failing to hold a hearing. See
___

Shraiar v. United States, 736 F.2d 817, 818 (1st Cir. 1984)
_______ _____________

(per curiam).

Affirmed.
________



































-2-







Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer