Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch, 94-1149 (1994)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 94-1149
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 20, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: September 19, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] ____________________ No. 94-1149 PHILIP D. HOPGOOD, ET AL.* _____________________ ____________________ Harold D. Vicente with whom Vicente Cuebas was on brief for __________________ _________________ appellants. Costs are awarded to the appellee.
USCA1 Opinion
September 19, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
____________________
No. 94-1149
PHILIP D. HOPGOOD, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Jaime Pieras, Jr., U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Coffin and Campbell, Senior Circuit Judges,
_____________________
Keeton, Senior District Judge.*
_____________________
____________________
Harold D. Vicente with whom Vicente & Cuebas was on brief for
__________________ _________________
appellants.
Carlos G. Latimer with whom Latimer, Biaggi, Rachid, Rodriguez-
__________________ ____________________________________
Suris & Godreau was on brief for appellees.
_______________
____________________
____________________
____________________
*Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.
Per Curiam. Substantially for the same reasons set
__________
forth in the opinion of the United States District Court for
the District of Puerto Rico in Hopgood v. Merrill Lynch,
_______ _______________
Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 839 F. Supp. 98 (D.Puerto Rico 1993),
______________________
we affirm. Costs are awarded to the appellee.
-2-
Source: CourtListener
