December 21, 1994
                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
                                 ____________________


        No. 94-1161 

                                HENRY CASTRO POUPART,

                                Petitioner, Appellant,

                                          v.

                           RAMON ALERS, WARDEN OF THE STATE
                       PENITENTIARY AND THE LAS MALVINAS ANNEX,

                                Respondent, Appellee.


                                 ____________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO


                    [Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]
                                              ___________________

                                 ____________________

                                        Before

                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________
                            Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________

                                 ____________________

            Henry Castro Poupart on brief pro se.
            ____________________
            Guillermo Gil,  United States Attorney,  Jo Ann Harris,  Assistant
            _____________                            _____________
        Attorney General, Theresa M.B. Van Vliet, Chief, and Lena D. Mitchell,
                          ______________________             ________________
        Attorney,  Criminal Division,  Narcotic  and Dangerous  Drug  Section,
        Department of Justice, on brief for appellee.


                                 ____________________


                                 ____________________




















                 Per  Curiam.   Pro  se petitioner  Henry Castro  Poupart
                 ___________    ___  __

            appeals a  district court order dismissing  his second motion

            to  vacate sentence  under  28 U.S.C.    2255.    Based on  a

            careful review of the entire record, and of all points raised

            on  appeal, we conclude that the district court order must be

            summarily affirmed.  See Local Rule 27.1.
                                 ___