Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

De La Rosa v. United States, 94-1174 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-1174 Visitors: 53
Filed: Aug. 17, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1174 GREGORIO IGARTUA DE LA ROSA, ET. denied, 469 U.S. 1209 (1985) (The ____ ______ right to vote in presidential elections under Article II -2- inheres not in citizens but in states; ________ ___ Loc.
USCA1 Opinion












UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________


No. 94-1174


GREGORIO IGARTUA DE LA ROSA, ET. AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant, Appellee.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Raymond L. Acosta, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Cyr and Boudin,
Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Gregorio Igartua on brief pro se.
________________
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Frank W. Hunger,
______________ __________________
Assistant United States Attorney, Barbara C. Biddle and Jacob M. Lewis
_________________ ______________
Attorneys, Appellate Staff Civil Division, on brief for appellee.


____________________

August 17, 1994
____________________



















Per Curiam. Appellant residents of Puerto Rico allege
__________

that their inability to vote in the United States

presidential election violates their constitutional rights.

Some appellants, who previously voted in presidential

elections while residing elsewhere but who are now ineligible

to vote in those elections, also challenge the

constitutionality of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens

Absentee Voting Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973ff et seq. The district
__ ___

court dismissed appellants' request for declaratory and

injunctive relief for failure to state a claim upon which

relief could be granted. We summarily affirm.

I

While appellants are citizens of the United States, the

Constitution does not grant citizens the right to vote

directly for the President. Instead, the Constitution

provides that the President is to be chosen by electors who,

in turn, are chosen by "each state . . . in such manner as
____ _____

the Legislature thereof may direct." U.S. Const. art. II,

1, cl. 2 (emphasis added). Pursuant to Article II,

therefore, only citizens residing in states can vote for
______

electors and thereby indirectly for the President. See
___

Attorney General of Guam on behalf of All U.S. Citizens
_____________________________________________________________

Residing in Guam etc. v. United States, 738 F.2d 1017, 1019
____________________ _____________

(9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1209 (1985) ("The
____ ______

right to vote in presidential elections under Article II



-2-















inheres not in citizens but in states; citizens vote

indirectly for the President by voting for state electors.").

Since Puerto Rico is concededly not a state, see Trailer
___ _______

Marine Transport Corp. v. Rivera Vazquez, 977 F.2d 1, 7 (1st
______________________ ______________

Cir. 1992) (status of Puerto Rico "is still not the same as

that of a State in the Federal Union"), it is not entitled

under Article II to choose electors for the President, and

residents of Puerto Rico have no constitutional right to

participate in that election. See Attorney General of Guam,
___ ________________________

738 F.2d at 1019 ("Since Guam concededly is not a state, it

can have no electors, and plaintiffs cannot exercise

individual votes in a presidential election."); Sanchez v.
_______

United States, 376 F. Supp. 239, 241 (D.P.R. 1974) (finding
_____________

similar claim "plainly without merit" for purpose of

convening three-judge court).

The only jurisdiction, not a state, which participates

in the presidential election is the District of Columbia,

which obtained that right through the twenty-third amendment

to the Constitution. Such a constitutional amendment was

necessary precisely "because the Constitution ha[d]

restricted th[e] privilege [of voting in national elections]

to citizens who reside[d] in States." H.R. Rep. No. 1698,

86th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 (1960), reprinted in 1960 U.S. Code
_________ __

Cong. & Ad. News 1459, 1460. Only a similar constitutional

amendment or a grant of statehood to Puerto Rico, therefore,



-3-















can provide appellants the right to vote in the presidential

election which they seek. See Attorney General of Guam, 738
___ ________________________

F.2d at 1019-20.1

II

Some appellants, who previously voted in presidential

elections while residing elsewhere, also assert that their

constitutional rights to due process and equal protection

have been violated by the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens

Absentee Voting Act [Act]. The Act provides that United

States citizens, including residents of Puerto Rico, see 42
___

U.S.C. 1973ff-6(6) & (7), who reside outside the United

States retain the right to vote via absentee ballot in their

last place of residence in the United States, as long as

these citizens otherwise qualify to vote under laws of the

jurisdiction in which they last resided. 42 U.S.C. 1973ff-

1. It does not apply, however, to citizens who move from one

jurisdiction to another within the United States. See 42
___


____________________

1. Appellants' contention that their right to vote in the
presidential election is secured by Article 25 of the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 6
I.L.M. 368 (1967) (entered into force Sept. 8, 1992), is
without merit. Even if Article 25 could be read to imply
such a right, Articles 1 through 27 of the Covenant were not
self-executing, see 138 Cong. Rec. S4784 (daily ed. Apr. 2,
___
1992), and could not therefore give rise to privately
enforceable rights under United States law. See United
___ ______
States v. Green, 671 F.2d 46, 50 (1st Cir.), cert. denied,
______ _____ ____ ______
457 U.S. 1135 (1982); United States v. Thompson, 928 F.2d
_____________ ________
1060, 1066 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 270 (1991).
____ ______
Nor could the Covenant override the constitutional limits
discussed above. See Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 15-16
___ ____ ______
(1957) (plurality opinion).

-4-















U.S.C. 1973ff-6(5) (defining "overseas voter" as a person

"who resides outside the United States").

Appellants claim that the Act illegally discriminates

against citizens who have taken up residence in Puerto Rico

rather than outside the United States, because the former are

not entitled by the Act to vote in their prior state of

residence. In fact, however, the Act does not distinguish

between those who reside overseas and those who take up

residence in Puerto Rico, but between those who reside

overseas and those who move anywhere within the United

States. Given that such a distinction neither affects a

suspect class nor infringes a fundamental right,2 it need

only have a rational basis to pass constitutional muster.

See FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 2096, 2101
___ ___ _________________________

(1993) (equal protection); Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502,
______ ________

537 (1934) (due process).

Without the Act, voters who move overseas could lose

their right to vote in all federal elections. However,

voters who move to a new residence within the United States

are eligible to vote in a federal election in their new place




____________________

2. Although it affects the right to vote, the Act does not
infringe that right but rather limits a state's ability to
restrict it. Moreover, nothing in the Act "prevent[s] any
State from adopting any voting practice which is less
restrictive than the practices prescribed in the Act." H.R.
Rep. No. 765, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 19 (1986), reprinted in
_________ __
1986 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 2009, 2023.

-5-















of residence.3 Hence, Congress had a rational basis for

seeking to protect the absentee voting rights only of the

former. While the Act does not guarantee that a citizen

moving to Puerto Rico will be eligible to vote in a

presidential election, this limitation is not a consequence

of the Act but of the constitutional requirements discussed

above.

Appellants' request for oral argument is denied. The
______

dismissal of appellants' claims is affirmed. See 1st Cir.
________ ___

Loc. R. 27.1.
























____________________

3. For example, a citizen who moves to Puerto Rico would be
eligible to vote in the federal election for the Resident
Commissioner. See Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act, 48
___
U.S.C. 891 (Resident Commissioner chosen by "[t]he
qualified electors of Puerto Rico"); 42 U.S.C. 1973ff-6(3)
(defining "[f]ederal office" to include Resident
Commissioner).

-6-







Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer