Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Crooker v. Howe, 94-1591 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 94-1591 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 28, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: September 28, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1591 MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ROBERT HOWE, ET AL. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum, dated May 19, 1994.
USCA1 Opinion









September 28, 1994
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT



____________________


No. 94-1591

MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

ROBERT HOWE, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Michael Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Selya and Cyr, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Michael Alan Crooker on brief pro se.
____________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Karen L. Goodwin,
_______________ _________________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.


____________________

____________________





















Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and
__________

the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the district court's memorandum, dated May 19,

1994.

Affirmed.
_________



















































Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer