[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________





        No. 96-1811



                                    UNITED STATES,



                                      Appellee,



                                          v.



                                STEPHEN MICHAEL DION,



                                Defendant, Appellant.



                                 ____________________





                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE



                       [Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]
                                          ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Selya, Cyr and Boudin,

                                   Circuit Judges.
                                   ______________



                                 ____________________



            Stephen M. Dion on brief pro se.
            _______________

            Jay P. McCloskey, United States  Attorney, Frederick C.  Emery and
            ________________                           ___________________

        Margaret D. McGaughey, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for
        _____________________

        appellee.





                                 ____________________



                                    April 25, 1997

                                 ____________________





































                      Per Curiam.   Stephen  Michael Dion appeals  from a
                      __________



            sentence  imposed upon  revocation  of a  term of  supervised



            release.   None of the  arguments Dion raises  on appeal were



            presented  to  the sentencing  court.    Having reviewed  the



            briefs and record, we find no error (much less plain error).



                      First,  the imposition  of  an  additional term  of



            supervised release was within the district court's authority.



            See  United  States v.  O'Neil, 11  F.3d  292, 301  (1st Cir.
            ___  ______________     ______



            1993).   Dion has offered no persuasive reasons to reconsider



            our holding in O'Neil.  
                           ______



                      Second, there is ample  evidence in the record from



            which  the district  court  could conclude  that  Dion has  a



            history  of alcohol abuse.  The two new special conditions of



            supervised release  were clearly directed at  addressing this



            problem.   Cf. United States v. Thurlow,  44 F.3d 46, 47 (1st
                       ___ _____________    _______



            Cir.)  (per  curiam) (no  abuse  of  discretion in  requiring



            defendant  to  abstain from  consuming  alcohol  in light  of



            personal history and continuing alcohol abuse), cert. denied,
                                                            ____________



            115  S. Ct.  1987  (1995).    We  are  persuaded  that  these



            conditions   are  rationally   related   to   the  goals   of



            rehabilitation, deterrence, and protection of the public.  



                      Affirmed.
                      ________



















                                         -2-