[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 96-2193
SHAUN HATHAWAY,
Plaintiff, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CLAREMONT,
Defendant, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Boudin, Circuit Judge. _____________
____________________
Donald L. Lader, Jr. and Law Offices of Michael C. Shklar on ____________________ ________________________________
brief for appellant.
Edward B. Mulligan, IV and Gallagher, Callahan & Gartrell, P.A. ______________________ ____________________________________
on brief for appellee.
____________________
MARCH 27, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed substantially for __________
the reasons enumerated by Chief Judge DiClerico in his order
dated September 16, 1996. Appellant has advanced no reason
to question the careful analysis of claim-preclusion
principles there set forth. The contention that appellee
waived or forfeited such defense by failing to assert it in
timely fashion, see, e.g., Calderon Rosado v. General Elec. ___ ____ _______________ _____________
Circuit Breakers, Inc., 805 F.2d 1085, 1087 (1st Cir. 1986) ______________________
(citing Restatement (Second) of Judgments 26(1)(a)), is
raised for the first time on appeal. We thus review that
claim for "plain error" indicative of a "clear miscarriage of
justice." Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, __________________________ ___________________
906 F.2d 25, 40 (1st Cir. 1990) (internal quotation omitted).
We see neither plain error nor a miscarriage of justice.
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1. ____________________________
-2-