Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Torres v. National Starch, 96-2194 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 96-2194 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 26, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , ____________________, APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO, [Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge], ____________________, Before, Boudin, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges. See Johnston v., Holiday , Inns, Inc., 595 F.2d 890, 894 (1st Cir.
USCA1 Opinion










[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 96-2194

LUIS A. TORRES,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL CORP., ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]

____________________

Before

Boudin, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
____________________

Luis R. Torres on brief pro se.
Juan Carlos Morales Ducret and Reichard & Escalera on brief for
appellee Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc.
Don M. Kennedy , Brooks R. Brown , Goodwin, Procter & Hoar , Manuel A.
Guzman, Rosa Maria Cruz, and McConnell Valdes on brief for appellee
Fisher Scientific Company.
Enrique Peral and Munoz Boneta Gonzalez Arbona Benitez & Peral on
brief for appellee Baxter Healthcare Corp.
Ricardo R. Rodriguez-Padilla, Orlando Duran-Medero and Ricardo L.
Rodriguez-Padilla Law Offices on brief for appellee JT Baker Chemical
Company.

____________________

SEPTEMBER 25, 1997
____________________





Per Curiam . We have carefully reviewed the district

court record and the parties' briefs and affirm the judgment of

the district court for essentially the reasons set out in its

Opinions and Orders, dated March 23, 1995 and July 9, 1996.

In relation to the court's grant of summary judgment

for JT Baker Chemical Co., appellant only argues that he never

received notice of Baker's motion; he does not claim that he

failed to receive a copy of the district court's opinion

granting summary judgment. By not presenting the question of

notice to the district court in the first instance, appellant

has forfeited appellate review of the issue. See Johnston v.

Holiday Inns, Inc., 595 F.2d 890, 894 (1st Cir. 1979). We

therefore do not address the merits of the Opinion and Order,

dated August 22, 1995.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 27.1.























-2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer