Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Martin v. Martin, 97-1189 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1189 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 19, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary:  on brief for appellee Steven Weiss, Chapter 7 Trustee., ____________, Stephan M. Rodolakis, Mark Foss, and Peters, Barhill, Massad , ____________________ _________ _________________________, Rodolakis on brief for appellee A. Richard Grebe.Per Curiam.and the record on appeal. Costs to appellees.
USCA1 Opinion











[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
____________________
No. 97-1189

IN RE: THUNDERBOLT REALTY TRUST,
Debtor.
____________________

ELEANOR B. MARTIN,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

RUSSELL E. MARTIN, SR., ET AL.

Defendants, Appellees.
____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Aldrich, Senior Circuit Judge, and ____________________
Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

Louis Kerlinsky on brief for appellant. _______________
Mark H. Bluver, Steven Weiss, Susan E. Zak, and Shatz, Schwartz & ______________ ____________ ____________ _________________
Fentin, P.C. on brief for appellee Steven Weiss, Chapter 7 Trustee. ____________
Stephan M. Rodolakis, Mark Foss, and Peters, Barhill, Massad & ____________________ _________ _________________________
Rodolakis on brief for appellee A. Richard Grebe. _________
Michael J. Rye and Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, P.C. on ______________ __________________________________________
brief for appellees Park West Bank and Trust Company and David Azran.
____________________
September 19, 1997
____________________


















Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs Per Curiam __________

and the record on appeal. We affirm the decision of the

district court that the complaint filed by appellant Eleanor

Martin failed to comply with the applicable statute of

limitations for the reasons stated in the court's well-

reasoned memorandum. See Loc. R. 27.1. The judgment entered ___

on December 18, 1996 is affirmed. Costs to appellees.

Affirmed. _________





































-2- 2






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer