Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Medrano-Diaz v. Gonzalez-Hernandez, 97-1231 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1231 Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 05, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , _________________________, Igor J. Dominguez and Ramon Torres Rodriguez for appellants. We affirm the judgment below for, substantially the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned opinions, of the district court and the bankruptcy court, respectively. , Medrano, Diaz v. Vasquez-Botet, 182 B.R.
USCA1 Opinion




[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]






_________________________

Nos. 97-1231/97-1232

VINICIO MEDRANO DIAZ, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

ORLANDO R. GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

_________________________

APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Daniel R. Dominguez, U.S. District Judge]

_________________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,

Hill,* Senior Circuit Judge,

and Boudin, Circuit Judge.

_________________________

Igor J. Dominguez and Ramon Torres Rodriguez for appellants.
Eli B. Arroyo for appellee Vasquez-Botet.
Victor P. Miranda Corrada on brief for remaining appellees.

_________________________


August 5, 1997
_________________________



______________________
*Of the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.







Per Curiam. We affirm the judgment below for

substantially the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned opinions

of the district court and the bankruptcy court, respectively. See

Medrano Diaz v. Vasquez-Botet, 204 B.R. 842 (D.P.R. 1996); Medrano

Diaz v. Vasquez-Botet, 182 B.R. 654 (Bankr. D.P.R. 1995).



Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.





































2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer