USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 97-1366
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
PASQUALE MUNAFO, A/K/A PAT, A/K/A FAT PAT,
Defendant, Appellant.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
___________
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
John Wall on brief for appellant.
_________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, James C. Rehnquist and
_______________ ___________________
Ernest S. Dinisco, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for
__________________
appellee.
____________________
October 14, 1997
____________________
Per Curiam. Upon careful review, we perceive no clear
__________
error in the district court's determination of the amount of
loss. Further, no improper double counting occurred in
adjusting appellant's sentence both for his managerial role
in the offense under U.S.S.G. 3B1.1(b), as well as for his
business of receiving and selling stolen property under
U.S.S.G. 2B1.1(b)(4)(B). See United States v. Reeves, 83
___ _____________ ______
F.3d 203, 208 (8th Cir. 1996).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
________ ___
-2-
