Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tunnicliff v. Moriarty, 97-1390 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1390 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Appellee.Circuit Judges., ____________________, Philip M. Stone on brief for appellant., Paul , M. , Cranston and Cranston , , Cranston, P.C.Per Curiam, . We have carefully reviewed the parties', briefs and the record on appeal. P. 39 by complying with the, procedures stated therein.
USCA1 Opinion










[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 97-1390


PAUL W. TUNNICLIFF,

Appellant,

v.

DENIS MORIARTY, JR.,

Appellee.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge]

____________________

Before

Selya, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.

____________________

Philip M. Stone on brief for appellant.
Paul M. Cranston and Cranston & Cranston, P.C. on brief for
appellee.


____________________

September 25, 1997
____________________





Per Curiam . We have carefully reviewed the parties'

briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm on grounds that

appellee Moriarty neither wilfully violated the stay nor caused

appellant Tunnicliff's injuries.

Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.






































The request in Appellee's brief for costs is denied
insofar as it arises under Fed. R. App. P. 38. Appellee may be
awarded costs under Fed. R. App. P. 39 by complying with the
procedures stated therein.

-2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer