Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Macfarlane v. Smith, 97-1542 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1542 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 10, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: PETER SMITH, ET AL. on, __________________ _______________________________________, brief for appellee Jack P. Crisp, Jr., Diane M. Gorrow and Soule, Leslie, Kidder, Zelin, Sayward , _________________ ___________________________________________, Loughman on brief for appellee Beryl Rich.
USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 97-1542

JAMES MACFARLANE,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

PETER SMITH, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.
____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior U.S. District Judge] __________________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

James MacFarlane on brief pro se. ________________
Philip T. McLaughlin, Attorney General, and Daniel J. Mullen, _____________________ _________________
Senior Assistant Attorney General, Civil Bureau, on brief for appellee
Peter Smith.
Cynthia L. Fallon and Law Office of Rodney L. Stark, P.A. on __________________ _______________________________________
brief for appellee Jack P. Crisp, Jr.
Diane M. Gorrow and Soule, Leslie, Kidder, Zelin, Sayward & _________________ ___________________________________________
Loughman on brief for appellee Beryl Rich. ________


____________________

November 10, 1997
____________________













Per Curiam. James MacFarlane appeals from the ___________

dismissal of his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Having carefully reviewed the record, "it clearly appears

that, on the facts alleged, the plaintiff cannot recover on

any viable theory." Wagner v. Devine, 122 F.3d 53, 55 (1st ______ ______

Cir. 1997). We affirm the dismissal of MacFarlane's ______

complaint essentially for the reasons stated in the district

court's Orders dated November 27, 1996 and March 27, 1997.



































-2-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer