Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cruz v. U.T.L., 97-1700 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1700 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 09, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary:  UNITED TEACHERS OF LOWELL, ET AL.____________________, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.Carlos A. Cruz on Motion for Relief from Judgment pro se.pauperis complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e).administrative remedies under Title VII.some of his present employment discrimination claims.
USCA1 Opinion












[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 97-1700


CARLOS A. CRUZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

U.T.L. - UNITED TEACHERS OF LOWELL, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

____________________


APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Edward F. Harrington, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Lynch, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

Carlos A. Cruz on Motion for Relief from Judgment pro se. ______________


____________________

December 9, 1997
____________________


















Per Curiam. Pro se appellant Carlos Cruz appeals __________

from the district court's judgment dismissing his in forma

pauperis complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). We vacate the

judgment and remand to the district court for further

proceedings.

Cruz filed his complaint asserting employment

discrimination and other claims under the in forma pauperis

statute, 28 U.S.C. 1915. Upon preliminary review, the

district court construed the complaint to be based on Title

VII and issued a show cause order directing Cruz to submit

his right to sue letter "indicating that he has exhausted his

administrative remedies" under Title VII. The court made

clear that failure to submit the letter by the deadline set

by the court would result in dismissal of the action under

1915(e). Cruz timely submitted his right to sue letter, but

the district court dismissed the action anyway, giving no

explanation.

The right to sue letter indicates that Cruz

exhausted his Title VII administrative remedies for at least

some of his present employment discrimination claims.

Therefore, we vacate the judgment below and remand to the

district court for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion. We express no opinion about the actual merits of

any of the claims asserted in the complaint.





-2-













Vacated and remanded for proceedings consistent ___________________________________________________

herewith. _________

















































-3-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer