Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gonzalez v. Marshall, 97-1879 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1879 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: JOHN MARSHALL, ET AL.Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.Mardoqueo Gonzalez on brief pro se. Essentially for the reasons indicated by the, magistrate judge in his report and recommendation, dated, March 24, 1997, the grant of summary judgment to, defendants/appellees is affirmed.
USCA1 Opinion


                         [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]


UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________


No. 97-1879

MARDO Q. GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

JOHN MARSHALL, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Charles B. Swartwood, III, U.S. District Magistrate Judge]

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

____________________

Mardoqueo Gonzalez on brief pro se.
Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and
Ann M. McCarthy, Counsel, Department of Correction, on brief for
appellees John Marshall, Paul Verdini and Thomas Dickhaut.
Bruce R. Henry and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller on brief for appellee
Pauline Sweeney.


____________________

March 12, 1998
____________________


Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record in this
case, including the briefs of the parties and the decisions
below. Essentially for the reasons indicated by the
magistrate judge in his report and recommendation, dated
March 24, 1997, the grant of summary judgment to
defendants/appellees is affirmed.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer