[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
____________________
No. 97-2316
DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT, CORP.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
K-MART CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
____________________
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________
_____________________
Johanna Emmanuelli Huertas, with whom Pedro E. Ortiz Alvarez __________________________ ______________________
and The Law Offices of Pedro E. Ortiz Alvarez were on brief for __________________________________________
appellant.
Jon R. Steiger, with whom Patrick M. McCarthy, Howard & _______________ ____________________ _________
Howard, Steven C. Lausell, James W. McCartney and Jim nez, ______ __________________ ____________________ ________
Graffam & Lausell were on brief for appellee. _________________
____________________
February 26, 1998
____________________
Per Curiam. On March 27, 1996, Downtown Development Per Curiam. ___________
Corporation ("Downtown") filed this action to recover damages
arising from K-Mart Corporation's ("K-Mart's") alleged illegal
occupancy of Downtown's property in Ponce, Puerto Rico. Downtown
appeals the district court's decision to grant summary judgment
in favor of K-Mart Corporation ("K-Mart").
We affirm on the grounds stated in the district court's
opinion and order. See Downtown Dev. Corp. v. K-Mart Corp., Civ. ___ ___________________ ____________
96-1497CCC (D.P.R. September 25, 1997). We find clause 27 of the
lease at issue dispositive. As the district court noted, that
provision grants K-Mart the option to remain as a month-to-month
tenant after the expiration of the lease until it is forced out
by the courts. In the instant case, K-Mart simply exercised this
option.
Costs to be assessed against appellant.
Affirmed. Affirmed ________
-2-