Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Downtown Development v. K-Mart Corporation, 97-2316 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-2316 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 02, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.______ __________________ ____________________ ________, Graffam Lausell were on brief for appellee.in favor of K-Mart Corporation (K-Mart).opinion and order. Corp. v. K-Mart Corp., Civ.lease at issue dispositive.by the courts.Costs to be assessed against appellant.
USCA1 Opinion






[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
____________________

No. 97-2316

DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT, CORP.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

K-MART CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________

Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________

_____________________

Johanna Emmanuelli Huertas, with whom Pedro E. Ortiz Alvarez __________________________ ______________________
and The Law Offices of Pedro E. Ortiz Alvarez were on brief for __________________________________________
appellant.
Jon R. Steiger, with whom Patrick M. McCarthy, Howard & _______________ ____________________ _________
Howard, Steven C. Lausell, James W. McCartney and Jim nez, ______ __________________ ____________________ ________
Graffam & Lausell were on brief for appellee. _________________



____________________

February 26, 1998
____________________




















Per Curiam. On March 27, 1996, Downtown Development Per Curiam. ___________

Corporation ("Downtown") filed this action to recover damages

arising from K-Mart Corporation's ("K-Mart's") alleged illegal

occupancy of Downtown's property in Ponce, Puerto Rico. Downtown

appeals the district court's decision to grant summary judgment

in favor of K-Mart Corporation ("K-Mart").

We affirm on the grounds stated in the district court's

opinion and order. See Downtown Dev. Corp. v. K-Mart Corp., Civ. ___ ___________________ ____________

96-1497CCC (D.P.R. September 25, 1997). We find clause 27 of the

lease at issue dispositive. As the district court noted, that

provision grants K-Mart the option to remain as a month-to-month

tenant after the expiration of the lease until it is forced out

by the courts. In the instant case, K-Mart simply exercised this

option.

Costs to be assessed against appellant.

Affirmed. Affirmed ________






















-2-






Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer