Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Baker, 98-1054 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 98-1054 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 08, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , Defendant, Appellant.and Lynch, Circuit Judge., Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Jonathan A. Toof and, F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for, appellee. We decline to address, the constitutional arguments that defendant raises for the, first time on appeal.
USCA1 Opinion


      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 98-1054

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ELWIN BAKER,

Defendant, Appellant.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]



Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.




Joseph S. Berman and Berman & Dowell on brief for appellant.
Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, Jonathan A. Toof and
F. Mark Terison, Assistant United States Attorneys, on brief for
appellee.





July 1, 1998






Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and
record, we perceive no merit in defendant's appellate
arguments. Particularly, the district court considered the
appropriate factors in revoking defendant's supervised release
and in imposing a term of imprisonment. We will not second-
guess the district court's assessment of witness credibility
and resolution of the conflicting evidence as to the time of
the sexual assault. The upward departure was amply supported
by the record and reasonable in degree. We decline to address
the constitutional arguments that defendant raises for the
first time on appeal.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer