Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Omosefunmi v. Service Processing, 98-1385 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 98-1385 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 14, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Rayford A., Farquhar, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellees. , The district court was not required to grant appellant's, application for default in these circumstances, and we find, appellant's allegations of judicial bias to be frivolous.
USCA1 Opinion


      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 98-1385

SAMSON OMOSEFUNMI,,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SERVICE PROCESSING CENTER, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]



Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.




Samson Omosefunmi on brief pro se.
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Rayford A.
Farquhar, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellees.





September 10, 1998







Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and
record, we find no merit in appellant's contentions. Dismissal
of appellant's complaint was sufficiently justified by the
reasons described in the government's motion to dismiss, which
reasons included defendants' immunity from suit and appellant's
failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
The district court was not required to grant appellant's
application for default in these circumstances, and we find
appellant's allegations of judicial bias to be frivolous.
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.















-2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer