Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Calixce, 98-1708 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 98-1708 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 07, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Government's Motion for Summary, Disposition., Per Curiam. Jean Baptiste-Calixce challenges his, conviction on the ground that the district court erred in, denying his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence allegedly, obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.
USCA1 Opinion


      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 98-1708

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

JEAN-BAPTISTE CALIXCE,

Defendant, Appellant.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]
[Hon. James R. Muirhead, U.S. Magistrate Judge]



Before

Lynch, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lipez, Circuit Judge.




Scott A. Lutes on brief for appellant.
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Jennifer E. Cole,
Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Government's Motion for Summary
Disposition.





April 2, 1999




Per Curiam. Jean Baptiste-Calixce challenges his
conviction on the ground that the district court erred in
denying his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence allegedly
obtained in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. The
government has moved for summary affirmance. We grant the
government's motion substantially for the reasons stated by the
district court in its Order dated February 10, 1998.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer