Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wright v. Commissioner, 98-2069 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 98-2069 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First CircuitNo. Sandra Susse on brief for appellant. After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.
USCA1 Opinion


       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 98-2069

GLENN WRIGHT,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant, Appellee.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Frank H. Freedman, Senior U.S. District Judge]



Before

Selya, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Stahl, Circuit Judge.




Sandra Susse on brief for appellant.
Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security
Administration, Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Karen
L. Goodwin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.





May 21, 1999





Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs
and record on appeal, we affirm the judgment for substantially
the reasons stated by the district court. The Commissioner's
decision was supported by substantial evidence, even if some
evidence in the record might have supported a different
conclusion. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human
Services, 955 F.2d 765, 769 (1st Cir. 1991); Rodriguez Pagan v.
Secretary of Health & Human Services, 819 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.
1987); cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1012 (1988).
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27.1.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer