Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. De La Cruz Moya, 99-1199 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 99-1199 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Assistant United States Attorney, and Michelle Morales, Assistant, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee. We reach this, conclusion essentially for the reasons stated in the district, court's Opinion and Order dated January 12, 1999. United States v., Guzman, 85 F.3d 823, 827 (1st Cir.
USCA1 Opinion


       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 99-1199

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

JUAN ANTONIO DE LA CRUZ MOYA,

Defendant, Appellant.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Juan M. Perez-Gimenez, U.S. District Judge]



Before

Torruella, Chief Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lynch, Circuit Judge.




Lawrence H. Schoenbach and Marc X. LoPresti on brief for
appellant.
Guillermo Gil, United States Attorney, Jorge E. Vega-Pacheco,
Assistant United States Attorney, and Michelle Morales, Assistant
United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.





June 7, 1999




Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the briefs and
record, we conclude that the district court properly denied
defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment. We reach this
conclusion essentially for the reasons stated in the district
court's Opinion and Order dated January 12, 1999. Defendant
failed to produce even "some evidence tending to prove that .
. . one sovereign was a pawn of the other." United States v.
Guzman, 85 F.3d 823, 827 (1st Cir. 1996).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.













Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer