Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Veale v. Hasbrook, 99-2348 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 99-2348 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 28, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: WILLIAM HASBROOK, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE, TOWN OF GILSUM, NH; JOAN MILLER, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF, SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH;Defendant.and Boudin, Circuit Judge.David T. Veale on brief pro se., John T. Alexander and Ransmeier & Spellman on brief for, appellees.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 99-2348 DAVID T. VEALE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. WILLIAM HASBROOK, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH; JOAN MILLER, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH; THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH, Defendants, Appellees, KENNETH DOOLEY, MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN FOR THE TOWN OF GILSUM, NH, Defendant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr., U.S. District Judge] Before Selya, Circuit Judge, Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and Boudin, Circuit Judge. David T. Veale on brief pro se. John T. Alexander and Ransmeier & Spellman on brief for appellees. SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 Per Curiam. Appellant David T. Veale appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment to appellees, the Town of Gilsum, New Hampshire, and certain members of its Board of Selectmen. After carefully reviewing the parties' briefs and the record, we affirm the judgment of the district court essentially for the reasons stated in its Order, dated September 17, 1999. We add that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a change of venue. Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer